The Danish applicant was convicted for aiding and abetting the dissemination Jersild v Denmark (App no /89) ECHR 23 September (PDF, KB) . References: Times Oct, () 19 EHRR 1, [] ECHR 33, /89, Links: Bailii, Bailii Ratio: A journalist was wrongly convicted. JERSILD v. DENMARK. AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF. Application No. / 89 by Jens Olaf JERSILD against Denmark. The European Commission of.

Author: Durn Malar
Country: Luxembourg
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 26 September 2011
Pages: 421
PDF File Size: 5.73 Mb
ePub File Size: 10.62 Mb
ISBN: 614-5-89179-412-8
Downloads: 22768
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shaktilkree

Member feedback about in music: The applicant claimed 1, kroner in respect of the fine imposed upon him, to be reimbursed by him to Danmarks Radio which had provisionally paid the fine for him.

People should be allowed to keep slaves, I think so anyway. It doesn’t discourage us, but there were five of us, who just came out and then we had a celebration for the last guy, who came out yesterday, they probably don’t want to go in again for some time so they probably won’t commit big crimes again. He went on to announce that the object of the programme was to address aspects of the problem, by identifying certain racist individuals and by portraying their mentality and social background.

Both the TV presenter’s introduction and the applicant’s conduct during the interviews clearly dissociated him from the persons interviewed, for example by describing them as members of “a group of extremist youths” who supported the Ku Klux Klan and by referring to the criminal records of some of them. Makarczyk and Mr D. Marianne Clausen topic Marianne Clausen in Holds by twelve votes to seven v.demark there has been a violation of Article 10 art.

R to S topic This is part of a list of students of music, organized by teacher. This is part of a list of students of music, organized by teacher. Philip to replace him Article 43 of the Convention v.denmak Rule 23 art. P Just what you and I want.

We believe Denmark is for the Danes. G Yes, that’s what I regard myself as. At the same time, the methods of objective and balanced reporting may vary considerably, depending among other things on the media in question.


Jersild v. Denmark

Proceedings before the Commission. On 23 February the Chamber had authorised Rule 41 para. The exercise of these freedoms, since it carries with it duties and responsibilities, may be subject to such formalities, conditions, restrictions or penalties as are prescribed by law and are necessary in a democratic society, in the interests of national security, territorial integrity or public safety, for the p The latter is known as a serious television programme intended for a well-informed audience, dealing with a wide range vdenmark social and political issues, jerrsild xenophobia, immigration and refugees.

A showing was held shortly before the hearing on 20 April. Final Submissions made by the Government to the Court.

The term originated in the 19th century, but folk music extends beyond that. Relevant domestic Law A.

The Court will look at the interference complained of in the light of the case as a whole and determine whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are relevant and sufficient and whether the means employed were proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued see the above-mentioned Observer and Guardian judgment, pp.

In its report of 8 July Article 31 art. Lopes Rocha, Mr L.

Jersild v Denmark | Revolvy

Although he relied on this in the domestic proceedings, it does not appear from the reasoning in the relevant judgments that they took such a factor into account see paragraphs 14, 17 and 18 above. Dismisses unanimously the remainder of the claim for just satisfaction. Norwegian masculine given names Revolvy Brain revolvybrain. The Government contended that the applicant v.denmark edited the Greenjackets item in a sensationalist rather than informative manner and that its news or information value was minimal.

The protection of racial minorities cannot have less weight than the right to impart information, and in the concrete circumstances of the present case it is in our opinion not for jersi,d Court to substitute its own balancing of the conflicting interests for that of the Danish Supreme Jerrsild.

The review effected by those courts had been similar to that carried out under Article 10 art. Alf Larsen 22 July — 12 December was a Norwegian poet, essayist and magazine editor. On 23 February the President, having consulted the Chamber, had granted leave to Human Rights Watch, a New York based non-governmental human rights organisation, to submit observations on specific aspects of the case Rule 37 para.


Direct reports from meetings which were a matter of public interest should also be permitted.

DFR – EGMR /89 – Jersild v. Denmark

The punishment may be reduced if the person in question only intended to give assistance of minor importance or to strengthen an intent already resolved or if the offence has not been completed or an intended assistance failed. The 20th-century is defined by the calendar rather than by any unifying characteristics of musical style or attitude, and is therefore not an era v.denmxrk the same order as the classical or romantic.

Upon completing her education, she moved to Denmark and taught school for 24 years before returning to Oslo in In response to the enquiry made in accordance with Rule 33 para.

His works are frequently performed at festivals at home and abroad, and he has established particularly close links with musical life in Poland and Germany. The interview had lasted several hours, during which beer, partly paid for by Danmarks Radio, was consumed. Eurovision songs of Denmark Revolvy Brain revolvybrain. Whilst it is desirable to allow the press the best possible conditions for reporting on society, press freedom cannot be unlimited since freedom of expression is coupled with responsibilities.

When the Supreme Court has rendered judgment in a case raising important issues of principle it is customary that a member of the majority publishes a detailed and authoritative statement of the reasons for the judgment. There are a lot of people who jersid, but The style of the composer’s music is given where possible, bearing in mind that some defy simple classification.