REPORT. ISO/TR. First edition. Reference number . This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC. (International Standard Risk Management ISO Draft Review) ISO , the international standard for Risk Management – ‘Risk Management. Hi:bigwave: Does anybody have a copy of the draft working document ISO they could share with little me? ttfn Ben.
|Published (Last):||28 April 2011|
|PDF File Size:||19.28 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.91 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
A FERMA voice on ISO implementation | Ferma
The decision to review ISO was taken at in Chicago in and now, 4 years later, a draft version of the proposed updates to the ISO document is available for users to see. Care needed to be taken in in considering all the points raised and discussions on the right way forward took considerable time.
The one remark I have is the note 1 on the definition of risk. In the same time period three other risk standards have been proposed by ISO covering disruption related risk, supply chain risk management and legal risk. Continuity Forum Policy Working Group Members can contact us directly to discuss the process and to obtain copies of document for comment.
The revision for the ISO standard is to be finalized in It can be positive sometimes expressed as opportunitiesnegative sometimes expressed as threats or both. The major task to accomplish is progress the revision of ISO As this sentence was followed by 29 definitions that fully defined risk management the ISO way. The process gives you the chance to suggest areas you would like to see adapted or removed and even add new elements that would benefit users in the front line.
Comparing ISO 31000 (2009) with the draft ISO 31000 (2017) – Part 2
There are substantial improvements that the committee feel will benefit the users of the standard such as the inclusion of the importance of human and cultural factors as well as the embedding of risk management within decision making that is now more strongly is emphasized.
The clauses on process has probably been the area that has received most comments during the revision.
Our main challenge was to find a fair and sensible balance between supplementing the chapter with necessary concepts and not losing sight of all other users. The message TC would like to pass on to the reader of the DIS is to critically assess if the current draft provides the required guidance while still remaining relevant to all organizations, in all countries.
Hosting services provided by: There was also support for more detailed and precise guidance though this ran the risk of adding to both the length and complexity of the standard.
The draft of the standard for review and comment is now available on the BSI Draft Review system at https: The content between brackets should be left out. A common theme found in the comments isoo the addition of concepts or examples specific to countries or industries. Before being sent to ISO the draft of the DIS was endorsed by the working group WG2 and reviewed by an editorial team who checked for typographic issues and consistency across the different sections.
The intention is to promote harmonization within ISO documents with respect to risk and its management. Find out more About Us. Draf view was formed at the Moscow meeting and stuck to while resolving the comments on the technical committee draft reviewed in Jordan.
The definitions still mentioned in the standard … the following apply are kept to a strict minimum and mainly those that have updated notes:.
The consequences are then the effects of uncertainty on the objectives related to the opportunity pursued. Please do review and pass on your thoughts and opinions by clicking the box below. The intention throughout the revision process in recent meetings has been to focus on the fundamentals and in doing so create a shorter, clearer and more concise document that is easier to read and apply. The vision was to xraft a framework clause that provides guidance that is relevant for every possible jso of the standard.
ISO/TR – Risk management — Guidance for the implementation of ISO
Initially it was agreed that only minimal changes would be made to the standard while the committee looked at the potential for more substantial revision.
For more information go to riskmanagement. It is important to keep in mind that we are not drafting an American or European standard, a public sector or financial services standard, but rather a generic draftt standard. Two of these, the disruption and supply chain risk standards, have failed to make the grade and have recently been officially dropped, but the legal risk standard ISO is now in development with the national standards bodies of China and the UK jointly leading the work.
Don’t be the weak link. More interpretations are possible, more definitions come into play and more options in the use of the standard are provided e.
The problem I have with this sentence is the parts between brackets. Articles Recognising threat – the importance of pre-incident surveillance. Although effects can also become risk sources, the way note 1 is phrased only leads to a short sighted view on what can be understood by effects.
For example, one could say that pursuing drqft opportunity, making use of ones strengths, while managing threats and weaknesses, can bring unexpected positive consequences. From the comments made by the contributing experts it was clear that Annex A should be removed and instead the topic dealt with separately through a New Work item proposal to address risk management maturity.