DIN Electrical installations in residential buildings – Part 1: Planning principles. standard by Deutsches Institut Fur Normung E.V. DIN DE. Elektrische Anlagen in Wohngebäuden – Teil 1: Planungsgrundlagen (Foreign Standard). Diese Norm gilt für die Planung von. Draft standard DIN – Draft. Electrical installations in residential buildings – Part 1: Planning principles. German title: Elektrische.

Author: | Moogugul Vugis |

Country: | Libya |

Language: | English (Spanish) |

Genre: | Technology |

Published (Last): | 22 August 2012 |

Pages: | 182 |

PDF File Size: | 5.77 Mb |

ePub File Size: | 1.47 Mb |

ISBN: | 552-8-97612-813-9 |

Downloads: | 97644 |

Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |

Uploader: | Mezikree |

Even if the cin guesswork should be by a whole magnitude in error, this would not change anything about the result. An individual dwelling — in effect a single-family home — causes losses worth around 40 cents annually. This result is particularly astonishing if you consider that the 1. Over the rest of the day, this larger cross section then reduces the losses.

With all care that has to be taken with respect to the assumptions and simplifications made, the following results become obvious: We see that the payback periods — now for only one standard size up — 81015-1 to values of 30 or 25 years, respectively.

## Electrical installations in residential buildings – Part 1: Planning principles

Proposal for a method Cable efficiency helpers Outlook. The calculation for the domestic washing machine from Tables 1 and 2 had produced 20 years.

This latter observation may be confusing at first sight, since electrical warm water supply, where installed, will let a lot more energy dib up the riser! Fluorescent Magnetic ballasts principle Magnetic ballast disturbances Compensation Electronic ballasts principle Electronic ballast disturbances Fluorescent lamp efficiency Leuchtstofflampen-Quecksilber.

Cynics may claim this was common practice anyhow.

If upgrading the conductor cross-section from 1. As an overall result, it can be stated that the riser may just be missed out of this consideration right from the start.

An assessment must be found for each individual cable. But let us have one more look at the riser supplying a single home, a few or a multitude of homes. Maximum and selected cable lengths; annual losses without electrical warm water supply. This leads to the relatively high values of 7. While such a high power is needed for just a few minutes per day, the requirements for larger conductor cross sections are the same as would be for permanent load. Further arguments like resource dib and CO 2 reduction would still come on top — if not then, now they would.

The riser need not be optimized anymore because it has already been energy optimized, although not for energy efficiency but other — compelling — reasons.

It is also listed in the tables but has already been included in the calculation of the table.

### Deutsches Kupferinstitut: Cable efficieny method

Regarding the quantification of line losses, this brings about the question which line length to assume. Maximum and selected cable lengths; annual losses with electrical warm water supply.

We must now look at how the expenditure required for this can 1801-1 kept within reasonable limits. The office Attempt to develop a method The multi-family home The single-family home Example 1: The installation method be B1 again. So one ought to calculate with half the load as a mean or, alternatively, with half the dkn length, neither of which was done here. Obviously, no relevant difference is seen by grid planners between this and an infinity of users. Due to the relatively coarsely tiered standard sizes and due to the abrupt leap of the voltage drop from 0.

Since the office has been in operation for 33 years already, an additional initial investment for conductors upsized to 2.

Good as it is so far, but now how to arrive at the losses?

Of course, the same load profile as for the one and only flat in the first line of the table was also applied to the respective riser. According to Approach 1 Table 3 or Table 4, respectivelythis factor corresponds to the relevant geometric average between the smallest possible and the greatest possible current.

In fact, every storey takes away its part of the load, and the last section is loaded only more with the current of two flats. Only they are not sufficient to create a methodology for determining this optimum. In other words, this is the root from the quotient of the least uniform by the most uniform load distribution across the year and across the circuits that is at all possible.

What was newly introduced into the table here is the column with the line losses W L occurring in the riser, calculated with the respective line lengths l select. Despite all the uncertainty with this precise, but estimate-based calculation, the factor of 6, on the other hand, allows for quite a certain assumption that the additional investment would have paid off until today.

Analogous investigations should now be carried out for the other load profiles.

These result in payback times of 7 and 6 years, respectively. In the first example Table 3 the factor F L is very high, since the junction box is only fully utilised on rare occasions on an annual average basis: However, the synthesis of the two can be developed further: A creative assumption is required again here, for so long already two calculation models are at hand: Special contract customers Anomalies, characteristics, further action Example 2: Fortunately a helpful colleague had been prepared to restore the lost data underlying the diagram Fig.

The disadvantage is that this is of no use to us, since transferring the profile from the overall operation to these individual final circuits does not offer a solution. In the first example Table 3 the factor F L is very high, since the junction box is only fully utilised on rare occasions on an annual average basis:. Using a relative indicator, e. Oberschwingungen Definitionen Spannung oder Strom?

From a qualitative point of view let us stay with simplifying approach 2, of transferring the load profile that is valid for the system in question to the final circuits. This being so, the estimate is quite likely to be still too high, since all risers have been calculated as being loaded with the entire current drawn by the building. In this particular case, however, the result also means that a practicable potential energy saving — as expected — hardly exists in relation to the final circuits of private homes.

With all care that has to be taken with respect to the assumptions and simplifications made, the following results become obvious:. Hence, the force to design the conductors to the peak of the occurring load is not really a cost driver but rather a piggy bank, viewed across the lifespan, adding erection and loss costs!

A different approach, however, would have resulted in preposterously short line lengths in the top part of the table, which would have been just as unrealistic. System Production of copper Recycling copper Availability of copper Life Cycle Corrosion behaviour copper materials Semi-finished copper products Copper composite materials.